And it is this detour that has caused directors to speak out so adamantly against motion smoothing. Plus, it can even degrade the images appearing on screen. Club, “Artificially increasing the frame rate and removing motion blur removes the filmic, dreamlike essence from films.” The issue is that these artificial frames often causes a deviation from the director’s original vision for the scene. It’s this hyperreal quality that has directors up in arms. However, when applied to HD movies or shows, it can create an artificial look, one that many have called “ the Soap Opera Effect. In practice, it’s most beneficial when it comes to watching sports, which, due to their quick pace, can get blurry on your TV set. Most modern TVs come with motion smoothing as a default. By starting a dialogue with the manufacturers themselves we hope to try and give directors a voice in how the technical standards of our work can be maintained in the home…” īut what kind of technology could possibly garner so much hatred amongst these industry-leading directors, producers, and writers? How does it affect the viewer experience? And, how does one turn it off? Motion Smoothing: What is it?Īt its most basic level, motion smoothing is the process of artificially increasing the frame rate of video, inserting fake frames in between the real frames, in an effort to remove motion blur. To this end, Christopher Nolan and Paul Thomas Anderson reached out, via the studio UHD Alliance, to television manufacturers. Modern televisions have extraordinary technical capabilities, and it is important that we harness these new technologies to ensure that the home viewer sees our work presented as closely as possible to our original creative intentions. “Many of you have seen your work appear on television screens looking different from the way you actually finished it. The following is an excerpt from an email sent in the September 2018 to the Directors Guild of America (DGA), discussing the issue of motion smoothing: So & I are all on board the anti-motion-smoothing campaign. But it should be a choice you make, not a hoop everyone has to jump through to unmake.” James Gunn tweeted that directors Rian Johnson ( The Last Jedi ), Edgar Wright ( Baby Driver ), Matt Reeves ( War for the Planet of the Apes ), Christopher McQuarrie, Tom Cruise, and himself were all “on board the anti-motion-smoothing campaign.” Following that tweet, Rian Johnson had this to say : “You want movies to look like liquid diarrhea, fine. Back in October of 2017, a number of directors used Twitter to express their disdain for this technology. oW2eTm1IUAĬruise and McQuarrie aren’t the first people in Hollywood to speak out against motion smoothing. I’m taking a quick break from filming to tell you the best way to watch Mission: Impossible Fallout (or any movie you love) at home. Alongside Mission: Impossible Fallout Director Christopher McQuarrie, Cruise took “a quick break from filming to tell you the best way to watch Mission: Impossible Fallout (or any movie you love) at home.” While many celebrities rely on social media to voice their opinions on political or social matters, Cruise was tackling a very different issue: video interpolation, more commonly known as motion smoothing. Last week, Tom Cruise took to Twitter for a very important PSA.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |